Category Archives: US Politics

We Were Arrested For Protesting Police Brutality

By my dear activist  friends Daniela Saczek and Marcia Olivo:

My name is Marcia Olivo. Last Thursday, I was arrested with seven members of the Dream Defenders at the Department of Justice’s offices in Miami after we refused to leave the lobby.


We were there to protest the death of Mike Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, but also the death of Israel “Reefa” Hernandez in Miami, both at the hands of police officers. I was also there for my own kids. As an immigrant from the Dominican Republic with a son in middle school, another in fourth grad, and a nephew I helped to raise in college, I could have been Michael Brown’s, Israel Hernandez’s or Trayvon Martin’s mother. That’s why I insisted on being a part of this civil disobedience. That’s why I risked arrest. I was one spunky, loud, native-Spanish-speaking, hurting woman joining a rambunctious and overwhelmingly college-age and younger crowd, together reclaiming our integrity and dignity. Participating in that action was my moral responsibility to my children, and the children of other women who suffer as direct and indirect victims of police brutality and state violence. As a mother of three black boys, I live in fear of the possibility that they may become victims of police brutality in this country. As a woman who has worked with and for survivors of domestic violence, I feel the need to stand with other women who have to endure violence from our decision to have or not to have children and then again to keep them alive and healthy.

Women are not only mothers, sisters, aunts, cousins, girlfriends or friends of the male victims of police brutality, we are also direct victims of police abuse as well. Countless undocumented women are victimized for simply working, driving a car to get to their workplace or to take their children to school, or even seeking help in situations of domestic violence because of their legal status. Women are the number-one growing prison population. I am part of a group of women in Florida who are saying enough is enough, who have come together to form a network of women of color leaders, to work together on solutions that will allow us and our children to fully participate in every opportunity and aspect of society including civic participation, economic security and reproductive health. Central to this are concerns over safety and protection of our reproductive rights: safety for ourselves, our bodies, and our children’s future and protection to our rights to have children and to raise them in safe and healthy environment or not to have them.                                                  ————————————————————————————My name is Daniela Saczek. Before I could even cry, scream or process the murder of Michael Brown, my body went into autopilot to organize a response and a call for justice.


I did so because, as a 23-year-old college graduate growing up in a low-income immigrant neighborhood, life taught me that police represent threats to the well-being of black and brown communities every day. But also as a young feminist I believe that is time for the feminist movement in the US to connect the dots by raising the visibility of the issues impacting the lives of poor women of color. The killing of Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Israel “Reefa” Hernandez and many more is a violation of women’s reproductive rights.

Reproductive justice emphasizes women’s deep contributions to the family, the community, all work, and every important aspect of life. It’s a perspective that realizes that nothing happens in a vacuum, and as a woman I am connected to the death of Mike Brown and other youths whose dreams and futures have been brutally taken. That could be my brother, neighbor, friend, boyfriend. How am I supposed to feel safe when I know any interaction with the police can quickly escalate to violence? How is anyone to rely on the cops to “protect and serve” when they are the same people responsible for so many deaths?

Despite our age difference we stand together as women, to fight injustices, and to take action to end the racial and gender-based violence in our lives, our bodies and our communities. We will continue to respond to the call for leadership in holding the police accountable for the crimes they perpetuate on our black and brown brothers and on all people of color.

(This article was first published by Feminist Campus – the world’s largest pro-choice student network. Click on the following link to see the article as it was published originally:


Veterans’ and GIs’ appeal to National Guard: 
”Stand with Ferguson protesters, not the police!”

From my brothers and sisters at MarchForward…

To our brothers and sisters in the Missouri National Guard

We are writing to you as active-duty U.S. service members and veterans, most of us having served in the Iraq war.

You have a choice you can make right now.

The whole world is watching the Ferguson police with disgust. They killed an unarmed, college-bound Black youth in broad daylight, and subsequently responded to peaceful, constitutionally-protected protests with extreme violence and repression.

Countless constitutional and human rights violations by these police have been documented over the course of the Ferguson protests; from attacking and threatening journalists, to using tear gas against peaceful protesters, including children.

Now, Governor Nixon is deploying you to serve under the command of those same police forces. But you don’t have to follow their orders—you can stand with the protesters instead.

Our true duty.

When we signed up, we swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.

The police in Ferguson are violating that Constitution.

The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press.

These laws are, as we are taught our entire lives, our most cherished Constitutional rights—the whole basis for the “freedom” we are told makes us the greatest country on Earth.

It is undeniable that the Ferguson police have been using extreme violence against peaceful protesters, suppressing the right of the people to free speech and the freedom to assemble. They have attacked crowds, with children in them, with rubber bullets, sound cannons and tear gas. People have been mass arrested for simply being at the protest.

The police have also begun sweeping houses door to door; a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment, protecting our right to have our home entered and searched without a warrant.

Freedom of the press has also been severely infringed upon by Ferguson police. Journalists have been arrested; photo evidence shows riot police firing tear gas directly at reporters and tearing down their camera equipment; Ferguson police have been caught on video threatening journalists with violence if they don’t leave, and declaring that they are not allowed in the protest area.

With such important and dramatic events unfolding, the right of the people in the United States to have the truth covered by the press is essential to any so-called democratic society.

The people have the right to protest. If we were truly honoring our oath, we would be in Ferguson to protect the protesters against the repression of their rights by the police.

We don’t just have a legal obligation, but a moral one.

Clearly, we would be within our legal rights to refuse to help the Ferguson police unconstitutionally suppress these protests. But beyond the constitutional case, we have a moral obligation to refuse to participate.

The Ferguson police are treating this like a war. And we know that not all wars are just.

These protests have done something very important in our society: they have raised the deep issues we face of inequality, poverty, racism and police misconduct onto a national stage. It has turned public consciousness to these real problems that plague our society.

Do you really want to be part of suppressing those civilians raising all these important issues on the national stage?

Racist police brutality is a real issue in America

The autopsy of Michael Brown confirms at least five eye-witness accounts that the young man—who was not even suspected of any crime—was shot while he had his hands in the air.

Those of us in the military—especially with combat experience—knows that this flies in the face of any Rules of Engagement, and we know that it is completely ridiculous to believe that Officer Darren Wilson feared for his life in anyway whatsoever.

Increasingly, the issue of rampant police brutality in America—most frequently by white officers against people of color—is garnering more and more attention on a national and international scale.

History is unfolding, with the whole world watching. You have a decision to make on which side of history to be on.

You will make history, one way or the other


If you take part in the suppression of the protests for Michael Brown, we will be enshrined in history just as the National Guard soldiers who followed their orders to attack and repress civil rights actions, union pickets and anti-war protests. History has not looked kindly on them.

But you have the chance to make a different kind of history.

Imagine the powerful impact it would have if you abandoned your posts and marched with the protesters.

That single action could have the biggest possible effect on the crisis in Ferguson and the larger issues it represents in the entire country. It could be a major turning point in the fight against racism, inequality and police abuse.

You wouldn’t be alone. There is a whole community of service members, veterans and civilian supporters who would defend your right to do so. And now, in this critical moment, we are urging you to exercise that right.

This appeal is supported by organizations and individuals who are dedicated and trained to help service members who refuse orders. Sign the appeal here and someone will contact you with more information, or email us at

If you are a veteran or active-duty service member, click here to sign this public appeal to the National Guard!

This appeal was initially signed by:

  • Kourtney Mitchell, US Army, 2011-present
  • Monique Salhab, US Army, 1997-2007 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Mike Prysner, US Army, 2001-2005 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Margaret Stevens, US Army, 1997-2004
  • Anonymous Air Force Technical Sergeant, 2000-present (Afghanistan war veteran)
  • Alynn McLellan, US Army, 2008-2012 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Adam Fuentes, US Navy, 2007-2012
  • Ryan Endicott, US Marines, 2004-2008 (Iraq war veteran)
  • William Griffin, US Army, 2004-2010 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Jason Cardenas, US Army, 2002-2007 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Hart Viges, US Army, 2001-2004 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Ross Caputi, US Marines, 2003-2006 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Camillo Mejia, US Army, 1995-2010 (Iraq war veteran)
  • James Circello, US Army, 2001-2008 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Jayel Aheram, US Marines, 2006-2010 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Miguel Colon, US Marines, 2001-2006 (Iraq war veteran)
  • Wendy Barranco, US Army, 2003-2006 (Iraq war veteran)

More veterans and service members are signing this public appeal.

Click here to add your name.


The VA access bill and the appointment of Bob McDonald: The quiet privatization of the VA

This past Thursday, August 7 President Obama signed into law the Veterans’ Access to Care through Choice, Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014; the week prior to that the U.S. Senate appointed Robert McDonald as the new VA secretary. Am I crazy or are these two events clear signals of the privatization of the Veterans Administration and veterans’ care?

Let’s see…

The VA access bill contains $16.3 billion dollars alleged to improve veterans’ access to and quality of medical care. Approximately $5 billion are designated to hire new doctors and nurses at nearly 1000 hospitals and other medical facilities throughout the United States; $2 billion to lease (not build) new medical facilities; and $10 billion for a program allowing veterans to seek outside help if they have waited 30 or more days for care or if they live farther than 40 miles from a VA facility. The bill also gives the new VA secretary unprecedented power to fire personnel, allowing for an appeals’ window of only one week.

As far as the new secretary, Bob McDonald, I doubt his credentials could have possibly been more business oriented. After serving only 5 years in the military, and having no experience whatsoever in healthcare, secretary McDonald moved on to build a profitable career in Corporate America. He served for four years as CEO of Procter and Gamble (P&G), a giant consumer goods multinational company. During his tenure, McDonald’s signature was to downsize the company (he downsized 10% of the company’s personnel!).  McDonald earned an estimated $15.9 million on his final year as P&G’s CEO, before being asked to leave by the company’s board, which claimed the company was not moving fast enough to improve efficiency.

One of McDonald’s main critics was Bill Ackman, a hedge fund investor who said McDonald served on the board of too many organizations to be able to really focus on P&G; those boards presently include Xerox Corporation and U.S. Steel. McDonald also serves as an advisor for several other groups.

While his credentials are mostly about business, the new VA secretary is no stranger to politics. He was appointed by President George W. Bush, and later re-appointed by President Barak Obama, to serve on the U.S. government’s Advisory Committee for Trade Policy. And the new secretary’s political loyalty is no secret to anyone; according to the Federal Election Commission records, McDonald has made political campaign contributions in excess of $30,000 to the Republican Party, with half of the contributions going to Mitt Romney’s campaign. He has also contributed to House Speaker John Boehner, who applauded his appointment and called him the right man for the job. The Senate appointed McDonald with a vote of  97-0.

My reading of this bill and appointment is that our government’s response to the veterans’ care crisis is to outsource health treatment to the private sector. Not only is most of the money going to outside personnel and facilities, but the new Chief Executive Secretary has been empowered to fire existing personnel with hardly any appeal’s recourse. And while all this money is going into the hands of a Corporate America Republican darling with no healthcare experience and minimal military service, no one in Congress is speaking about the huge conflict of interest that his several corporate connections will present when handing out billions of dollars to outside private entities and personnel, with near absolute power to fire existing employees and hardly any funds to build new VA facilities.

It is time for the U.S. government to start facing the real crisis in the health care and wellbeing of veterans, which unequivocally points to a mentality and addiction to prevailing war-for-profit policies. Sadly, it seems that rather than learning from this crisis, Washington has decided to turn it into an opportunity to turn the VA into another business venture. Sadder still is that no one in Congress, or in the public at large, is doing or saying anything about it.